Archive for Homosexuals

What A Farce

Posted in America, Britain, Child Abuse, Children, England, English Schools, European Union, Gays, Human Rights, News with tags , , , , on 06/09/2017 by floroy1942

Britain is really going bonkers (and I put that politely). A Priory School in Lewes has gone so far as to ban skirts in order to introduce a more gender-neutral uniform.

The headmaster said, “Transgender students are only a small aspect of why we have made this decision, there are five or six trans-students currently at the school.” So the whole school has to wear a transgender uniform to satisfy these five or six queers?

I have a long time given up on Britain as a place to live, for the whole country is going mad. How long before other schools join the ‘transgender revolution’? It is sickening to me that such rules have to be passed to satisfy these people.

Several parents have criticised the move – especially since they weren’t consulted before the big change. One mother with a daughter at the school said that her daughter wasn’t happy with having her gender taken away. “My daughter said she has got a gender and it’s female so being gender neutral when she has got a gender is a big deal for her, as she’s proud to be a girl,” she commented.

“The hypocrisy is what gets me the most,” said another mum. “If girls dressing differently than boys is now to be considered sexist, then it is equally sexist to have female teachers wearing skirts and not wearing ties.” “If they want this, they must live the values they force on others and go fully gender free. The school is creating a hostile environment for girls by treating their views with contempt.”

Chief executive Susie Green said “adding gender neutral uniforms is one of many simple ways that schools can help any pupils struggling with their gender in any way. Schools need to take a clear line to accept and embrace all diversity, no matter how small the numbers affected.”

I find this most disturbing,  and wonder what the U.K. will be like in ten years time. It makes me wonder if Britain is going mad! What is our world going to look like in ten or twenty years time.


The Upside-Down World Of Today!

Posted in America, Britain, Children, English Schools, Gays, Homosexuals, Modern World, News, Parenting, Teens with tags , , , , on 24/01/2016 by floroy1942
Richard Cairns - Headmaster

Richard Cairns – Headmaster

Until now schoolgirls wear a skirt and schoolboys wear trousers along with a blazer as part of the school uniform at all schools in England, but a private boarding college in Brighton has changed this tradition. The headmaster Richard Cairns has now removed that rule and the school pupils can wear trousers or skirt as they see fit. This is yet another step in the mad craze of making life gender neutral.

So from now we could see young boys turning up at school wearing a skirt if they are that way inclined, and young girls wearing trousers. According to the headmaster the rule is designed to make trans students or students experiencing gender dysphoria feel more comfortable. On the subject he remarked, “If some boys and girls are happier identifying with a different gender from that in which they were born, then my job is to make sure that we accommodate that.”

Teaching Children About Devious Sexual Practices Is Wrong.

Teaching Children About Devious Sexual Practices Is Wrong.

Cairns believes that students should be able to express their identity both in and out of school, and he believes that being able to choose what they wear is part of that. It would seem to me that he is overstepping his bounds as an educator, for his sole job is to educate these youngsters, not make statements or change the rules to accommodate those who are neither the one nor the other.

It’s almost as bad as the UK universities of Lancaster and Northampton that introduced gender neutral toilets.

You may not hear much these days about those who are confused about what they are, i.e. male or female (and I put that nicely), but these perverts are still hard at work getting their devious message across, especially to the younger generation.

It seems that very many people today want to make these perverts feel at home and give them all the freedom they want to go after whomsoever they please. Sorry! But it does not impress me. I guess we’ll just have to wait until the Muslims take over the country in twenty or so years time, for then all the deviants will be heading for the nearest port or airfield and life can finally return to normal.


Pig Power at Ground Zero Versus Tolerance (if you get my drift)!

Posted in Arab, Gays, Homosexuals, Islamic Revolution, Modern World, Muslim, Religion, USA with tags , , , , , , , , on 25/09/2010 by floroy1942

Ground Zero Mosque? - No Way!

On the 7th of September I wrote about Pig Power and Ground Zero, which much to my surprise received over 500 hits. Today I received a forwarded e-mail from a good friend that offers another solution to the problem, and thought I might share it with you.

I have no idea who wrote the original text, but what it has to say is quite profound. The message was as follows:

“I am appalled that so many of my friends are against the mosque near Ground Zero.

We should allow it in order to promote tolerance.

I propose that a gay nightclub be opened next door to the mosque.

We could call it “The Turban Cowboy” or “You Mecca Me Hot”.

Next door could be a butcher shop that specializes in pork.

And right across the street a very daring lingerie store called “Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret”.

Then we will see who is tolerant!”

Muslim Prayer

The above would probably be a little more difficult to implement, but who is to say it is not possible. I am sure that any one of the three businesses, if they actually opened, would cause a storm of protests from our good, kindly and tolerant friends, the Muslims.

Gay Bar

So far as the gay night-club is concerned, it wouldn’t surprise me to find the mosque started operating Muslim ‘snatch-squads’ who’s job it would be to get rid of all who enter these premises.

Pork Butchers

I have a feeling that any Muslim walking down the street would cross to the other side rather than walk past a butchers shop selling pork so it is a fair bet they would petition the New York City Mayor to have two pedestrian crossing put in place, one either side of the butchers premises.

The Lingerie Shop

The Lingerie shop might not prove so much of a problem to the mosque, and most Muslim men seem to be lustful sex maniacs. One can assume this from passages in the Koran that states women must be covered from head to toe (i.e. the burqa) because otherwise they will be a temptation to (Muslim) men. Kind of speaks for itself doesn’t it.

Very few people know what Muslim women wear under their Burqa’s, but according to Jeremy Clarkson of BBC Top Gear fame who says he saw a Muslim woman in a burqa slip and fall in London, revealing very sexy pink underwear underneath, it would seem anything goes, underneath! Therefore, it’s a fair bet the lingerie shop could do quite well in a surreptitious way.

You can just imagine the conversation when Mohammed slips in through the back door to buy something new for his ‘turtle-dove’; Assistant: “Yes Mohammed, what will it be today?” Mohammed, looking furtively around the shop: “Listen! I’ve told you before, don’t call me Mohammed, call me Colin.”

Ah Well! Inshallah!

My thanks to the anonymous writer.


So Finally it Begins!

Posted in Britain, Christianity, England, Free Speech, Gays, Homosexuals, Human Rights, Insanity, Justice, Modern World, Muslim, Police, Religion, UK, United Nations with tags , , , , , , , , on 02/05/2010 by floroy1942

Free Speech! What is it worth to you in our democratic state? I hope it means something, and I hope you consider it worth fighting for because a sneaky, stealthy attack on free speech is underway. Today, a Christian preacher, Dale McAlpine, was arrested in Wokington, England for daring to utter the words ‘Homosexuality is a sin against God and the Bible”  in a public place.

Dale McAlpine – Street Preacher

He was charged under the 1986 Public Order Act, which originally was implemented to combat rowdy football fans, drunks and violent rioters. The man is a devout Christian but it would seem he does not have the right to say publicly what he believes in. Such is the level to which life in England has stooped. He told the Police that he made no reference to homosexuality during his sermon, given from the top of a stepladder, but the words were uttered to a woman who engaged him in conversation. According to the Community Service Police Officer, who is a homosexual and relations officer for homosexual, lesbian, trans-gender and bisexual deviants, he made the statement in a loud voice for all to hear.  The fact that this person is homosexual, and quite probably personally motivated,  I suppose has no bearing on the case!!!! Either way, the unfortunate man was placed in the back of a police van and ‘put through the system’ like a common criminal.

I find it incredible that such a thing could happen in the country of my birth, and one that I love dearly. This simple man was not doing anyone any harm, except for the fact he ruffled the feathers of a pompous, over-bearing and personally motivated community service officer who practically accused him of starting a riot.

Miguel Hayworth

An almost identical situation developed in Manchester at the end of July 2009 when a father and son were reading passages from the Bible on the street and were threatened with arrest for inciting hatred and racism.

What’s He Got We Don’t – FREE SPEECH

It all goes to show that our right to free speech is under attack by small-minded bigots who think the only people allowed to preach their brand of religion are those from minority groups. If Christians do it in a Christian country they are inciting a riot. Balderdash!

As Sam Webster, lawyer for the Religious Institute pointed out, the police “must also support the rights of free speech”, something enshrined in the United Nations Human Rights Charter. It would seem the more rights we get, the less we can use them!

Heaven save us from ourselves.


Now Homo’s Can Sue the Clergy!

Posted in Children, England, Gays, Homosexuals, Human Rights, Insanity, Justice, Modern World, MP's, Parliament, Relationships, UK, UN, United Nations with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on 04/03/2010 by floroy1942

The time is almost here when homosexuals can sue clergy who refuse to ‘marry’ them in a church. In a new ‘Human Rights’ twist, the latest amendment to Harriet Harman’s Equality Bill could force priests to go against their faith and beliefs, or be sued on the grounds of human rights violations.

Lord Alli at a Gay Parade

A last minute amendment to the Bill introduced by homosexual Peer Lord Waheed Alli in the House of Lords was passed even though the change was introduced too late for any form of debate. It allows for the first time, homosexual ‘marriages’ i.e. Civil Partnerships, to be performed in our churches. While the new amendment does state that these ceremonies may be carried out in places of worship, it also allows for national faith groups to refuse to carry them out. However, according to high ranking politicians and clergymen, this leaves the door open for any priest who refuses to perform the service to be sued by the homosexual couple under the Discrimination Laws of the Human Rights Act.

The Human Rights Act finds its roots in the Declaration of Human Rights introduced by the United Nations Assembly in 1948, and was intended to ensure that everyone is treated equally, based on the standards of the time. When the declaration was drafted, no-one could for-see that during the last three decades the original intention of the Charter was to be hi-jacked by many fringe groups like

Abu Qatada-Used Human Rights Law

non-whites, immigrants and homosexuals, who saw it as a way to get what they want. This includes criminals who have in many instances used the Act as a means to escape justice.

It comes as part of a government attempt to outlaw bias against homosexuals and minority groups, and to my mind is just another ploy by Labour to grab the homosexual vote in the next election. Civil Partnerships have to date been allowed only in non-religious premises like Registry Offices, hotels and stately homes, with places of worship excluded. Now that barrier has been removed.

Although the document states ‘national faith groups will not be forced to carry out civil partnerships’, many believe that same-sex couples will seek redress against clergy who refuse to ‘marry’ them in church under the Equality Bill or Human Rights Act.

Both the Catholic and Anglican Churches stand fast on the 2000 year old doctrine that marriage is a sacred union between a man and a women, and why shouldn’t they?

Lord Waddington

Lord Waddington, a former Home Secretary said; “If this amendment were carried, it would only be a matter of time before it was argued that it was discriminatory for a church incumbent to refuse to allow a civil partnership ceremony to take place when the law allowed it.” He added; “a clergyman prepared to register marriages but not to register civil partnerships would be accused of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in the provision of services, and pressure would be brought to bear on him to pocket his principles and do what he believed to be wrong”.


What this means in a nutshell is the clergy would be caught between allegiance to their principles and beliefs, or a costly day in court! It would seem individual priests and clergymen have no human rights at all! Well maybe not so, but shall we say homosexuals have a lot more rights because they know how to milk the system!

There are some churches that welcome the idea of performing civil unions for homosexuals. A group of liberal Jews, Quakers and Unitarians have stepped forth to declare they welcome the idea. This does not however solve the problem for the Catholic and Anglican Churches who hold steadfast on their beliefs.

There is little doubt that homosexuals couples will be lining up at the church doors as soon as this amendment is passed into law, if only to

Togetherness - Bah Humbug!

see if they can get away with it. When that happens, there will doubtless be much soul-searching among the clergy. I cannot see the Catholic Church giving way on this issue, but I hesitate to give the same assurance with regard to the Anglican Church. It is possible they will see no other way than to bow to the inevitable or risk costly law suites by frustrated homosexual couples.

I find it disgusting that this group of misfits cannot be satisfied with what they have achieved already, i.e. legal partnerships under the law and the right to adopt children, but no, they must have their cake and eat it too! Peter Tatchall, a well-known campaigner for homo rights has already stated; “Our next goal is to secure marriage equality, to end the prohibition on lesbian and gay couples having a civil marriage in a registry office.” In other words they want to have the same status and rights, and be properly married in church in the same way normal married couples do. Will these people never be satisfied?

What makes them think they should have the same rights as a married man and woman? To achieve what they are after they will destroy whatever remains of the sanctity of marriage, and destroy whatever morality there is left in the world. It will make a mockery of every normal couples marriage and destroy the last vestiges of decency that exists. Yes! I know it sounds a bit dramatic, but its what I and many others believe, even though we have no say in the matter.

OK! So Who Do I Call Mummy?

And what about the children! So far as homosexuals adopting children is concerned, I find it abhorrent, and in no way believe that any child with two male parents stands any chance of a normal upbringing, despite them not being short on love for the child. Homosexual adoption is as yet in its infancy, and no-one can tell what the long term affects will be on a child’s development. I guess the picture on the left says it all.

Accuse me of ‘gay bashing’ if you like, but  that is not my intention, I just wish they behaved like normal individuals then there would be no need for this blog. I fail to see why normal people must have the ‘gay’ agenda shoved down their throats every day of the year. The disgusting display of men cavorting in skimpy outfits during a ‘gay parade, that normal people would get arrested for wearing in public are a disgrace. Be a homosexual if you wish, but keep it to yourselves, leave the church alone, and stop flaunting your deviance like a badge of honour!

In conclusion I have only this to say, if we throw away the last vestiges of morality and decency we will be left with anarchy.


%d bloggers like this: