Archive for Criminals

Should We Bring Back The Death Penalty?

Posted in America, Britain, England, European Union, Human Rights, Justice, News, People's Rights, Political Correctness, Prison with tags , , , , on 29/05/2017 by floroy1942

A Of Luxury

The number of murders being carried out these days has gone through the roof and the Law  is not dealing with it properly. When I was young murderers were sentenced to death by hanging and that insured they would never commit such a crime again. Nowadays, murderers are sentenced to little more than ten years and are released after three or four. Many have gone on to commit murder again.

There can be little doubt that with the interference of the European Human Rights Commision and our ‘home-grown Do-Gooders’ our justice system has become a disaster. Every day we hear of murders being committed and the law cannot handle it. Britain has become a nation of killers, and that is sad. People are not even safe in their own homes.

When we leave the European Union I hope that the government will do something to stop this disease once and for all. We need to get back to the laws of the 1940’s and 50’s if this country is ever to become peaceful. It is despicable that you cannot walk down a street in the evening in most towns and cities without being robbed, attacked, or murdered.

I wonder how the anti-death sentence people would feel if one of their family were to be killed? I think they would rapidly change their minds if it was someone dear to them. It is a sad fact that these people have come to rule the law system and made it impossible for our judges to give a proper sentence. Our legal system has become so soft that killers, rapists and thieves get away with their crimes, serving only a very short sentence that does nothing to dissuade them from committing more crimes.

It also evident that the comforts of a prison sentence are hardly a dissuader for these people to ‘go straight’. In all prisons in Britain they have all the comforts of home with each cell having a TV, music centre, computer games and the like. This is not the right way to handle serious criminals, for the only thing they miss is their freedom. They should be made to work every day and have all their ‘toys’ taken away, leaving them with just a bed, washbasin, and toilet in the cells.

Naturally, this would cause a tremendous upset among the criminals and the Army should be brought in to control them for the prison guards could not handle it. Among the prison guards there are many who are in the service of the prisoners and allow them free reign in the prison. These people should be sacked and properly disciplined guards brought in.

If the death penalty is reintroduced for murder we can be sure that the number of killers would rapidly decrease, and people will be much safer on the streets and in their own homes. I just hope that Theresa May’s government will do the right thing, for if she does we will get back to a peaceful existence once again.

Roy.

The Justice Farce

Posted in America, Britain, England, European Union, Human Rights, Muslim, News, People's Rights, Political Correctness, Prison with tags , , , , on 11/04/2017 by floroy1942

It amazes me how the world had changed over the past seventy years. You can’t turn on the news without hearing that someone has been murdered or attacked. All across the world there are killings in every country day by day. Crime has become so normal that it is seldom reported on the news unless it is a multiple killing.

The Killer Released Early

What has happened to the world and mankind? Have we become so immune to killing that we think nothing of it? In Britain killers do not get a proper sentence for they get ten years only, but are out in three or four. When I was young they were sentenced to death for their crimes. Now the ‘Do-Gooders’ have made all that disappear and sentences are getting shorter and shorter.

In Britain we have such things as ‘Community Service’ which is an utter farce. Those who are sentenced to this rarely turn up, and if they do they do not do as they are supposed to, or fail to carry out what they are told properly. It’s a big joke!

In countries all across the world killers are getting more and more frequent and in some areas of Britain people are afraid to walk on the streets in case they are attacked or robbed, especially at night.

Hanging

In countries like America they are locked up, and in some countries they are still hanged, but the movement to ban the death penalty is gaining ground all across the world. Why! In my view, if you kill someone you deserve to die.

Families all across Britain have to accept the court rulings when one of their family members are killed. There can be no doubt that mankind is sliding into anarchy at an ever-increasing rate in many countries.

In Britain today the Law is an utter joke and I’ll give you an example. Muslims can hold rallies in any town or city and they are escorted by the police. They carry signs that say ‘Death to all non-Muslims’, ‘We demand Sharia Law’ and ‘Islam will dominate the world’.

Muslim Demonstration

On the other hand if a single white person starts to demonstrate against the Muslims they are immediately arrested. Now where is the common sense in that.

The government is the one to blame for this mess because they do nothing against the Muslims for fear of causing trouble on our streets. For years they have allowed the Muslims to virtually take over towns and parts of our cities.

But to get back to the main theme of this post, Killers have it very easy in Britain, and also in Europe where the ‘Do-Gooders’ have strangled our justice system to the extent where it is no longer seen as justice.

In America killers go to jail for a long time, but very few are actually put to death for their crimes. The numbers are dropping year on year.

Rape

The countries of the world have to get on top of this problem if people are to live in peace. The law has to protect the public from rampant killers, rapists and thieves. The only way to do that is to bring back the death penalty and make them pay for what they have done. If this happens the number of killings will nosedive to very few as it used to be.

Roy.

Cameron And The Human Rights Act

Posted in Britain, Conservative Party, David Cameron, European Union, Human Rights, Immigrants, Justice, News, Politics with tags , , , , on 31/05/2015 by floroy1942
A Man With A Hard Job Ahead Of Him.

A Man With A Hard Job Ahead Of Him.

The European Human Rights Act (EHRA) has for years been a bone of contention in the United Kingdom. Now it seems that David Cameron is trying to get it replaced with a British Human Rights Act (BHRA). I wish him luck, but it seems it will be a hard road to follow.

Already some Tory backbenchers are rebelling against the decision, some after having quiet conversations with Nicola Sturgeon who is dead against the idea. She is very busy sowing the seeds of dissension among Cameron’s backbenchers to back up her own refusal to accept the planned legislation.

Nicola Sturgeon - A Woman Who Knows What She Wants And How To Get It!

Nicola Sturgeon – A Woman Who Knows What She Wants And How To Get It!

What some of these people do not seem to realize is that immigrant criminals, and even British criminals are making a joke of British justice by using this act to escape proper punishment, or in the case of many immigrants, to evade deportation. The list of problems caused by this Act is endless, and it fails to ensure that justice is done in many areas.

Before Tony Blair brought in the HRA in 1998 there was nothing wrong with the justice system in this country. It worked well, for all classes of people. Justice was done and more importantly, seen to be done. Now we have a pot pourri of laws that allow many criminals to escape proper justice because of the dictates from Strasbourg.

The HRA is intended to protect ‘right to life, privacy, and free speech’ among others, but when you look at life in the U.K. today, at least free speech has been successfully stifled by Tony Blair’s Race Laws which protect immigrants. Say a single word against immigrants on the street today and you are immediately arrested. But as we all know, the reverse is not true!

Rights For Whom?

Rights For Whom?

There have been many cases of immigrant career criminals that our courts have not been able to deport because of Article 8 of the EHRA, which is the so-called ‘Right to Family Life’. So we are forced to allow them to stay and they continue with their chosen profession.

As I have often said, it took more than ten years before Britain could deport the two Muslim Imams who were recruiting impressionable young Muslims to go and fight for the Jihad. You may remember Abu Qatada and Abu Hamsa. Ten years of constant appeals to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg about one thing or another, but we won eventually, even if it did cost the tax payer many millions.

Aso Mohammed Ibrahim Will Be Allowed To Remain In The UK Despite Leaving Amy Houston, 12 Dying In The Road.

Aso Mohammed Ibrahim Was Allowed To Remain In The UK Despite Leaving Amy Houston, 12 Dying In The Road.

There is also another story I wrote about an immigrant career criminal who ran over a small girl with his car. He stopped, got out of the car and looked at her, but instead of trying to help he drove over her with his rear wheels and sped off. Needless to say she died. The Justice system wanted to deport him because of his continuous criminal activities but couldn’t because he claimed a right to family life with an English girl he married. They did not live in the same town let alone the same house, but Strasbourg told Britain we could not deport him. Such is the Human Rights Act in all its glory!

It is true that there is much good in the Act for it protects many otherwise vulnerable people, but there are areas where it goes much too far, especially in the area of crime. Now the Court wants to stop us sentencing serial murderers and rapists to life imprisonment for example! They say we must review the case every so often with a view to releasing these maniacs!

The Fate Of British Justice

The Fate Of British Justice

Believe me when I say we would be much better off without this millstone around our necks, and introduce a proper Bill of Rights for the U.K. One that at least ensures that justice can be done as in the old days, but at the same time protects the vulnerable. What we have now is totally inadequate, for it can be misused in many ways by those wishing to escape justice.

Roy.

Muslim Appeasement – A Prime Example

Posted in America, Britain, England, Europe, Government, Immigrants, Muslim, News, Police, Religion with tags , , , on 25/01/2015 by floroy1942

There are continual complaints in Britain about everybody from the government to law enforcement appeasing Muslims who live among us. While it is necessary to respect the religion of Muslim immigrants up to a point, there are times when people go overboard and this is a prime example.

Standard Police Entry Tactics

Standard Police Entry Tactics

The following is a copy of an e-mail that is currently going the rounds, and while it is accurate in some details, it gives a somewhat distorted view of the way in which Police handle house searches of Muslim suspects.

The e-mail:

THESE ARE INSTRUCTIONS HANDED OUT TO ALL OFFICERS AT C.I.D COURSES AND ANTI-TERRORISTS COURSES IN THE BEDFORDSHIRE FORCE/SERVICE

UK’s Bedfordshire Police’s rules regarding terrorists and dangerous criminals:

If they’re non-Muslim
* Consider the most opportune time of day to be able to arrest suspects with minimum resistance
* Apply all necessary force to enter the premises and arrest suspects accordingly.

If they’re Muslim:
* Community leaders must be consulted before raids into Muslim houses.
* Officers must not search occupied bedrooms and bathrooms before dawn.
* Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises.
* Cameras and camcorders should not be used in case of capturing women in inappropriate dress.
* If people are praying at home officers should stand aside and not disrupt the prayer. They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.
* Officers should take their shoes off before raiding a Muslim house.
* The reasons for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.
* Officers must not touch holy books or religious artefacts without permission.
* Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.

I did some research into this affair and found a statement by the Bedfordshire Police that gave the true story. It shows that some points in the e-mail are accurate but there is much more to the story. These guidelines were issued by the National Home Office and Association of Chief Police Officers.

THIS IS THE RESPONSE HANDED OUT BY THE BEDFORDSHIRE POLICE:

This message claims to contain a list of instructions given to police in Bedfordshire in the UK regarding police entry to Muslim households. The list provides information about how police should conduct themselves in Muslim households so that their activities do not offend the household’s residents with regard to their religious beliefs and customs. The protest message decries what it considers to be a continued appeasement of Muslim citizens in the UK and asks recipients to pass on the information so that other British residents will be aware of the issue.

As detailed in the Bedfordshire Police statement quoted below, there are strong similarities between many of the points listed in the protest message and the actual set of guidelines provided to police. That said, however, the following information should be noted:

  • The advice given to police about entry to Muslim households consists of guidelines only, not concrete instructions or ironclad rules as suggested in the message. The information given to police makes it clear that the guidelines “should not impinge on, or supersede the objectives of the police action”.

  • The guidelines used by Bedfordshire Police are derived from National Home Office / Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) guidelines. Thus, the guidelines were not created specifically by the Bedfordshire Police.

  • The Bedfordshire Police statement notes “that the same considerations and respect for faith and diversity are always applied no matter what the belief of the household, Muslim or otherwise.”

In March 2010, the Bedfordshire Police published the following statement on its website in response to an enquiry about the protest email from a member of the public:

Dear Member of the Public,

REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT Reference No F-2010-00207 With reference to your request for information received on 26th February 2010, I note you seek access to the following information:

The following is an item circulating on the internet which is self explanatory.

Will you please verify to the authenticity of it as true copy or otherwise, put out by the Bedfordshire Police for guidance of its officers.

I am required by the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (The Act) to handle all requests in a manner that is blind to the identity of the requestor. Any information released in response to a request is regarded as being published, and therefore in the public domain without caveat.

Police Raid A Muslim Home

Police Raid A Muslim Home

In response to your questions, I have today decided to release the information requested in full as I can see no harm to any individual, the community, the police service or other bodies. After considering whether releasing this information will affect the good order and functioning of community, government or other public service affairs, I believe it is in the public’s interest the information be released. The information lies within the arena of public safety and may provide common benefit to members of the community. Releasing this information will not identify any individual or compromise any court case, law enforcement or investigation.

With reference to your recent enquiry and in response to your question I can confirm the following: Response – The item you refer to is incorrect and is not ‘Bedfordshire Police’s rules regarding terrorists and dangerous criminals’ as the website claims.

Bedfordshire Police does have guidance for entering households which was derived from National Home Office / Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) guidelines. While the information on the website is not the same, there are some similarities to our guidance for some basic considerations when entering Muslim households, especially for pre-planned operations, which is summarised below:

  • Innocent occupants of a household such as women and children may be present and Police should never under-estimate the impact of any loss of their personal dignity. Muslim women may be more flexible in their choice of dress at home amongst family members than outside and police entry could contribute to a loss of dignity. Opportunity should be afforded for occupants to cover themselves sufficiently to comply with the etiquettes of “Hijab” if a non-family member is present – and that includes the head for women.

  • The same level of etiquette and respect should be observed in Muslim households as in a Muslim place of worship, such as a Mosque. Female officers must be available wherever practicable to deal with females and there should not be any cross gender contact by the officers.

  • Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station. All clothing needs to remain pure for prayer and the denial of appropriate clothing will be a very serious issue for the individual.

  • If possible, officers should not take shoes into the houses, especially in areas that might be kept pure for prayer purposes – nor should they step on any prayer mats etc. This might be difficult in some cases but needs to be seriously considered – plastic overshoes may be an option in some cases if the cleanliness/ purity of the overshoes can be maintained.

  • Non-Muslims are not allowed to touch Holy Books, Qurans, or religious artefacts without permission. In the current climate the justification for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.

  • The aftercare of those not detained must be considered. Sufficient arrangements should be made to offer alternative accommodation to those who are removed from their homes whilst lengthy searches are carried out. If they are not removed from the house they should be allowed some flexibility and privacy.

  • Deployment of family liaison officers should be considered to minimise the impact on the families and the local community.


This guidance is purely of an advisory manner and was written in 2005 at the time of the increased tensions following the 7/7 bombings and applies in the main to Counter Terrorism operations. It is made clear the advice should not impinge on, or supersede the objectives of the police action.

The same considerations and respect for faith and diversity are always applied no matter what the belief of the household, Muslim or otherwise.

While the above is supposed to ensure that Police do not infringe upon the religious rights of Muslim immigrants, it does show that the amount of consideration given to these people is way and above that given to non-Muslims.

If the Police go into a house or apartment of a non-Muslim the first the occupants know about it is the sound of the battering ram used by the Police to smash open the door.

Next they rush into every room, sometimes with guns waving and everyone is told to raise their hands. There is no consideration for the fact there may be women in the house, or even children, and they certainly don’t remove their boots. So I guess if you are a criminal, or wish to become one, converting is Islam is your best option for then you will have a chance to escape out the back door while the police are busy removing their boots at the front.

Integration

Integration

It is indeed sad to see so much appeasement of Muslim immigrants in Britain when even criminals get so much attention. I have often said that if these people wish to move to a western country they have to abide by our rules and respect our culture. But this is not the case when government and others are making such strenuous efforts not to upset them.

In a recent development, publisher Oxford University Press was criticised by politicians for advising UK writers not to include pigs or sausages in books they wrote for children that would be sold overseas. In the Oxford Press’s view this would upset Muslims and Jews. A recent report indicated that some lunatic suggested that children’s piggy banks should be banned because it would upset Muslims.

A Shameful And Disgusting Statement  From Our Prime MInister

A Shameful And Disgusting Statement From Our Prime MInister

I am at a stage when I despair at the way the British people are bending over backwards to satisfy these people and not offend them in any way. We should be standing up for our own way of life, traditions and culture and the message should be, if you cannot adapt to the British way of life there are other parts of the world where you can settle.

We were once a proud race with a history that was the envy of the world, but now we are slowly digging our own graves, and within maybe twenty years or so our culture and way of life will be a thing of the past. Sad to say, but the same is happening throughout many European countries, and even in America but at a much slower rate.

Is This Your Grand-Children In Years To Come?

Is This Your Grand-Children In Years To Come?

To tell the honest truth, I am just glad I will not live long enough to see the end of European culture, or in the event that the people finally wake up, the civil wars on the streets predicted by Enoch Powell so long ago.

Roy.

There’s Dumb, Dumber and Unbelievably Dumb!

Posted in Britain, European Union, Government, Human Rights, Justice, News, Police, Politics, Prison, UK with tags , , , , on 05/05/2014 by floroy1942

Reading the news today has revealed to me how utterly stupid our government really is. You would expect them to do silly things now and then, but nothing that could be classed as putting the public at risk. But sad to say that has happened – again!

A Vicious Robber

A Vicious Robber

I refer to the fact that a vicious robber sentenced to thirteen life sentences for brutal robberies has escaped after being let out on ‘day release’ from an open prison. The man is question, Michael Wheatley must be laughing himself sick at the stupidity of the British legal system that not only kept him in an open prison, but allowed him out on day release. Naturally, as you would expect he did a runner and is now being sought by police, as if they don’t have enough to do!

Michael Wheatley, otherwise known as the ‘Skull Cracker’ was sentenced at the Old Bailey in 2002 for a string of really brutal raids on banks and building societies. He got the name of Skull Cracker for his habit of pistol whipping victims over the head with a blank-firing pistol during the robberies. He even went so far as to repeatedly hit a 73 year-old woman over the head in an act of sheer brutality.

Caught on A Security System Camera

Caught on A Security System Camera

For his deeds he received thirteen life sentences for robbery and thirteen concurrent five-year sentences for possessing an imitation firearm. The judge said he must serve a minimum of eight years. Now for a start off, how can someone be sentenced to life, and be told he must serve a minimum of eight years??? Perhaps the judge thought he might die after eight years!

This is one of the most stupid judicial systems in the world where they call it a life sentence but you must do a minimum of eight years. Either he is in prison for life or he is in for eight years, why name it any different. The whole sentencing system in the UK is a total and utter farce from beginning to end. Is it just a smoke-screen to fool the public into thinking someone got the sentence they deserve?  Its no wonder the criminals in Britain are falling on the floor laughing.

The Justice System Is In Need Of Repair

The Justice System Is In Need Of Repair

What makes it even more incredible is that he committed the above offences just three weeks after being released from a twenty-seven year sentence for other robberies!!!! I suppose the judge sentenced him that time to twenty-seven years but he must serve a minimum of five years. Either way, you would have thought any sane judge would recognize this person for what he is with him going on the rampage just three weeks after release from a previous sentence.!

HMP Standford Hill Open Prison On The Isle of Sheppey

HMP Standford Hill Open Prison On The Isle of Sheppey

Also, you have to ask why such a man was serving his sentence in an Open Prison??? This is a very relaxed prison system where prisoners have little or no restrictions and are allowed out each day to work. They are supposed to be ‘training’ facilities where inmates are prepared for life back in the community when their sentences are nearly over. But surely, going straight back to robbery again after being in prison for ‘twenty-seven’ years must have told these idiots something, i.e. that he cannot be trusted, and yet he still goes to an open prison where he can just walk out the door!!! It is absolutely astounding!

I have to admit that I am truly and utterly amazed at the crass stupidity of those in charge of our justice system, for believe me, this is not an isolated case.

The Scales Of Justice - Weighted In Favour Of The Criminal

The Scales Of Justice – Weighted In Favour Of The Criminal

It is no wonder that crime is rife in the country when the entire sentencing system is such a joke. If you don’t pay your taxes you go to jail for longer than a killer or a rapist. Is that right? There are so many killers who are paroled after serving a mere fraction of their sentence and end up going back into crime, sometimes within a week of release. And yet the politicians cannot see this. Why?

I believe part of the problem is the so-called prison overcrowding. Prisoners must have a cell to themselves with their own TV, games centre and sound system because of the Human Rights Goody Goody Brigade. According to them we have to treat our prison population better than the victims of the crimes they commit, all in the name of Human Rights. If the prisons are overcrowded then put two in a cell, or three, who cares they are criminals. They do not have the right to be better kept than their victims!

British Justice In Action

British Justice In Action

Another major problem is the ‘good-goody two shoes’ on the parole boards who have the responsibility to decide if a prisoner is readjusted enough to be released on parole. Are these people mental??? They listen to the sob stories of hardened criminals and let them out after they have served a fraction of their sentence. The ‘toerags’ leave the prison with a big smile on their faces and go straight back to what they were doing before. Wheatley is a prime example of that.

It is way past time that we get out from under the heavy yoke of the Human Rights Commission in Europe and get back to making our own laws and standards again for these rules are making a mockery of the justice system.

Nigel Farage - Perhaps The Country's Only Hope.

Nigel Farage – Perhaps The Country’s Only Hope.

I do not support any political party and I never have, but this time around I am sure that the only way forward for the UK is to support UKIP in the hope they can do better than the other three waste of space, namely the Con/Lib/Lab crowd, all of whom have brought us to this sorry state.

Like everyone else I have no idea what UKIP will be like as a government, but they can certainly be no worse than the other lot. I do not think it a good idea to withdraw totally from the EU for that will have serious economic consequences, but we have to refute all control of our justice system and immigration from Brussels.

Phew! I’m glad I got that lot off my chest. May your days be happy, and may all criminals rot in hell!

Roy.

Absurdity Of The Highest Degree

Posted in Britain, Conservative Party, England, Government, Human Rights, Justice, Politics, Prison, Theft, UK with tags , , on 14/08/2013 by floroy1942

I cannot believe that a so-called ‘educated’ man can tell the government that we should not send thieves and fraudsters to jail!  Prof Andrew Ashworth, a ‘legal expert’, and Vinerian Professor of English Law at Oxford University, has produced a pamphlet  to be distributed in which he says that jail time should be reserved for those “who commit crimes of a violent, sexual or threatening nature”.

Prof Andrew Ashworth

Prof Andrew Ashworth

He also argued against imprisoning repeat, non-violent offenders. He said, “for ‘pure property offences’, including theft, handling of stolen goods, criminal damage and fraud, imprisonment was disproportionate”. In his words, “Instead, the priority should be to deal with such offences in the community, giving precedence to compensation or reparation for the victim and, where the offence is sufficiently serious, imposing a community sentence.”

He claims that some 20,000 people go to prison each year for theft or handling stolen goods, 5,000 for fraud and 1,000 for criminal damage. The effect of his policy would reduce the number of men serving prison sentences by 8% (5,000 men) and women by 21% (700 women), saving around £230m each year.

Mugger In Action

Mugger In Action

O.K. clever dick, how you ‘compensate’ a couple who have been robbed of everything of value in their house? Pass the buck onto the insurance company who will pay a fraction of the value of the stolen articles, if they pay at all?  How do you ‘compensate’ old age pensioners who have been robbed of their most cherished possessions gathered over many years, and who may suffer serious illness as a result of the loss? What planet does this idiot live on, certainly not ours! It seems fairly certain that this pontificating fool has never been robbed or assaulted by a criminal. Perhaps he should go and talk to the many victims of crime before mouthing off!

This has raised a huge response from the public and many are saying that prison time does not stop re-offending, which is often true. So let us look at this argument and bisect the problems involved with keeping crime off our streets.

All The Comforts Of Home

All The Comforts Of Home

I agree with most of the comments that currently, prison does not stop the majority of criminals from re-offending, but that is for one simple reason, ever since the introduction of the Human Rights Laws we have been forced to turn our prisons into something resembling a holiday camp compared to the past.  We see often enough pictures of prisoners playing pool, lounging around, and of course every one has a TV, music and /or games centre in their cell. They have curtains on the windows so the sight of the bars will not traumatized them (oh my goodness, heaven forbid that they should be traumatized!), and the days of them doing hard labour are long behind us. Many of the custodial sentences handed out by the court, IF they get one, are so lenient as to mean nothing for the average criminal. For all the good prison does these days in getting criminals back ‘on the right path’ we might as well sentence them to a year in Butlin’s. Statistics have consistently shown that most of those sentenced to less than eighteen months automatically return to crime, sometimes within days of release.

Another Poor Victim In For A Surprise

Another Poor Victim In For A Surprise

On the other hand, those who get Community Service have no incentive to ‘go straight’. It is a fact that most times they do not turn up for work, and when they do they skive off somewhere. There is almost no supervision, and those sentenced to it find it a joke. There is absolutely no incentive whatsoever for an habitual thief or thug to turn away from crime, mainly because it pays well, and even if caught there is practically no comeback. Judges are consistently giving lighter and lighter sentences to hardened criminals to relieve the ‘over-crowding’ in our prisons and keep the Human Right’s Nutters happy.  Their argument is that even a serial child molester/rapist or serial killer has the right to his own cell  along with all the comforts of home.

Personally, I see nothing wrong with there being two, three, or even four prisoners to a cell and if they don’t like it, don’t do the crime! All the comforts currently enjoyed by serious criminals should be removed until they are left with a bed, a wash basin, and a toilet. For most less serious crimes, even six months of living in those conditions would be enough to deter all but the hardened criminal away from crime. The sentence received would be dependent on the criminal record and the crime. Serious offenders would live in the same conditions, but for a much longer period. Another factor is that criminals should be made to do hard labour 12 hours a day. All this pussyfooting around with pool tables, TV’s etc should be banned.

Boy George Doing 5 days C.M. For Cannabis Possession

Boy George Doing 5 days C.M. For Cannabis Possession

As for the joke known as Community Service, that should be banned entirely and replaced with prison time, for even three months in a prison with a harsh regime will be enough to persuade most, if not all petty criminals that crime does not pay. At the moment it does, and criminals are making large amounts of money at the expanse of the pain and misery of their victims. It has to stop, and to hell with their human rights until such time as they can prove themselves to be fit to re-join society. We can at least be happy that the Justice Minister Damian Green has rejected the proposals outright as he should.

In a speech to Magistrates in Canary Wharf London Mr. Green said “I think that would not just send the wrong signal to criminals and the public, it would send the wrong signal to victims. Repeat offending, even non-violent theft, can be a huge problem for an individual family, for an individual victim and can often blight a whole community. Habitual, prolific offenders should have the fear of prison hanging over them.” I agree with that except for one point, what is there to fear from a prison sentence these days except the loss of freedom of movement?

The Victim Support Group had this to say:  “Victims tell us they want more than anything else the punishment to fit the crime and for the criminal not to re-offend”.

Quite right I say, make criminals wish they had never crossed the line! There is too much emphasis on the criminals Human Rights and not enough on the victim! That has to change.

Roy.

Life Should Mean Life – Another CHR Cockup!

Posted in Britain, Conservative Party, David Cameron, England, Europe, Human Rights, Insanity, Justice, Prison, UK with tags , , , , on 09/07/2013 by floroy1942

I was astounded to read reports today that the European Convention on Human Rights has once again interfered in British Law on the side of criminals. This time they are saying that to send a convicted killer to prison ‘for life’ was “inhuman and degrading”. They are talking about some of the most vicious and callous killers in our prisons, and say they have the right to a review of their prison sentence, with the possibility of release. Their report is in reaction to an appeal brought by three of Britain’s most brutal killers, namely, Jeremy Bamber, Douglas Vinter and Peter Moore.

Meddling European Judges.

Meddling European Judges.

In the opinion of the judges, for a life prison sentence to “remain compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights there has to be both a possibility of review and a possibility of release”. In effect, this means that the British Government must amend the law to ensure it complies with the CHR dictates, which would give life term prisoners the right to demand release. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights which consisted of 17 judges, did say that their decision did not mean that killers like Bamber,  Vinter and Moore could look forward to being freed in the near future.

Many UK politicians, including the Prime Minister David Cameron have openly disagreed with the verdict, in  fact the Prime Minister even went so far as to say in true politician fashion, that he was “very, very disappointed”. Ooooh David! Why don’t you just come out and say it David – “Shove your decision where the sun don’t shine”. That would really be telling the interfering busybodies!

Lets have a quick look at the killers in the spotlight in this case.

Jeremy Bamber Murdered His Entire Family For Profit

Jeremy Bamber Murdered His Entire Family For Profit

Jeremy Bamber, who was born in 1961, murdered his step-father, mother, sister, and her six-year-old twin sons in his parents’ home at White House Farm. He then placed the weapon, a shotgun, in the hands of his sister who suffered from schizophrenia, and shot her too to give the impression of a murder suicide by his sick sister. According to the prosecution in the case, he did this to secure a large inheritance. He received five life sentences in 1994.

Douglas Vinter - Double Killer

Douglas Vinter – Double Killer

Douglas Vinter, born 1970 in London, England, was first convicted of murder in 1996, having stabbed to death train worker Robert Eden (24) in a Middlesbrough railway cabin. At the time, Vinter had been working as a railway signalman. He served a mere nine years in prison for Mr Eden’s murder before being released and moving to Tees-side. A year after being released from prison, Vinter married Anne White, but they separated after seven months because during their stormy marriage, Vinter had attacked his wife twice. On 11 February 2008, he strangled and stabbed her to death at his mother’s home in Normanby, Teesside while high on drugs and alcohol.

Peter Moore Killed Four People

Peter Moore Killed Four People

Peter Moore who was born 1940, is a serial killer who in 1995 murdered four men, Henry Roberts, a 56-year-old gay man, Edward Carthy, a 28-year-old man whom Moore met in a gay bar, Keith Randles, a 49-year-old traffic manager, and Anthony Davies, 40. All were stabbed to death and mutilated  “for fun”.

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said in an interview: “People will find the ruling intensely frustrating. I think this will simply reinforce the desire in this country for wholesale reform of our human rights laws. I suspect that the vast majority of the public think the court is just getting this wrong – at the very least it should be a matter for the British Parliament.” Well, you got that right Mr, Grayling!

There are of course many more killers of the same ilk serving life sentences in our prisons, in total 54, but some have had there sentences reduced even though they will still be old men when they are released.

Well, Mr. Grayling - 'Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!'

Well, Mr. Grayling – ‘Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!’

This whole saga brings to light once again how the EU Court of Human Rights is interfering in British Justice because it is being manipulated by criminals who more often than not get what they wish. It is a further stab in the back for the relatives of victims who must already face the prospect of their loved one’s killers often not getting a justifiable sentence. Many of these men, like Douglas Vinter, are repeat killers who have murdered someone else after being released from prison for their first murder. Others have killed multiple times, but still Strasbourg thinks we must respect their ‘Human Rights’. Well I say, to hell with their human rights and lets see the law on the side of the victims  for a change. It took ten years to deport the terrorist preachers Qatada and Hamsa because of their interference in British Justice, and I for one say NO MORE!

For me, the only course open to the government is to tell Strasbourg to get the hell out of the British Justice System and let us deal with these people under British Law!

Roy.

%d bloggers like this: