Archive for Clergy

Now Homo’s Can Sue the Clergy!

Posted in Children, England, Gays, Homosexuals, Human Rights, Insanity, Justice, Modern World, MP's, Parliament, Relationships, UK, UN, United Nations with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on 04/03/2010 by floroy1942

The time is almost here when homosexuals can sue clergy who refuse to ‘marry’ them in a church. In a new ‘Human Rights’ twist, the latest amendment to Harriet Harman’s Equality Bill could force priests to go against their faith and beliefs, or be sued on the grounds of human rights violations.

Lord Alli at a Gay Parade

A last minute amendment to the Bill introduced by homosexual Peer Lord Waheed Alli in the House of Lords was passed even though the change was introduced too late for any form of debate. It allows for the first time, homosexual ‘marriages’ i.e. Civil Partnerships, to be performed in our churches. While the new amendment does state that these ceremonies may be carried out in places of worship, it also allows for national faith groups to refuse to carry them out. However, according to high ranking politicians and clergymen, this leaves the door open for any priest who refuses to perform the service to be sued by the homosexual couple under the Discrimination Laws of the Human Rights Act.

The Human Rights Act finds its roots in the Declaration of Human Rights introduced by the United Nations Assembly in 1948, and was intended to ensure that everyone is treated equally, based on the standards of the time. When the declaration was drafted, no-one could for-see that during the last three decades the original intention of the Charter was to be hi-jacked by many fringe groups like

Abu Qatada-Used Human Rights Law

non-whites, immigrants and homosexuals, who saw it as a way to get what they want. This includes criminals who have in many instances used the Act as a means to escape justice.

It comes as part of a government attempt to outlaw bias against homosexuals and minority groups, and to my mind is just another ploy by Labour to grab the homosexual vote in the next election. Civil Partnerships have to date been allowed only in non-religious premises like Registry Offices, hotels and stately homes, with places of worship excluded. Now that barrier has been removed.

Although the document states ‘national faith groups will not be forced to carry out civil partnerships’, many believe that same-sex couples will seek redress against clergy who refuse to ‘marry’ them in church under the Equality Bill or Human Rights Act.

Both the Catholic and Anglican Churches stand fast on the 2000 year old doctrine that marriage is a sacred union between a man and a women, and why shouldn’t they?

Lord Waddington

Lord Waddington, a former Home Secretary said; “If this amendment were carried, it would only be a matter of time before it was argued that it was discriminatory for a church incumbent to refuse to allow a civil partnership ceremony to take place when the law allowed it.” He added; “a clergyman prepared to register marriages but not to register civil partnerships would be accused of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in the provision of services, and pressure would be brought to bear on him to pocket his principles and do what he believed to be wrong”.

Crucifix

What this means in a nutshell is the clergy would be caught between allegiance to their principles and beliefs, or a costly day in court! It would seem individual priests and clergymen have no human rights at all! Well maybe not so, but shall we say homosexuals have a lot more rights because they know how to milk the system!

There are some churches that welcome the idea of performing civil unions for homosexuals. A group of liberal Jews, Quakers and Unitarians have stepped forth to declare they welcome the idea. This does not however solve the problem for the Catholic and Anglican Churches who hold steadfast on their beliefs.

There is little doubt that homosexuals couples will be lining up at the church doors as soon as this amendment is passed into law, if only to

Togetherness - Bah Humbug!

see if they can get away with it. When that happens, there will doubtless be much soul-searching among the clergy. I cannot see the Catholic Church giving way on this issue, but I hesitate to give the same assurance with regard to the Anglican Church. It is possible they will see no other way than to bow to the inevitable or risk costly law suites by frustrated homosexual couples.

I find it disgusting that this group of misfits cannot be satisfied with what they have achieved already, i.e. legal partnerships under the law and the right to adopt children, but no, they must have their cake and eat it too! Peter Tatchall, a well-known campaigner for homo rights has already stated; “Our next goal is to secure marriage equality, to end the prohibition on lesbian and gay couples having a civil marriage in a registry office.” In other words they want to have the same status and rights, and be properly married in church in the same way normal married couples do. Will these people never be satisfied?

What makes them think they should have the same rights as a married man and woman? To achieve what they are after they will destroy whatever remains of the sanctity of marriage, and destroy whatever morality there is left in the world. It will make a mockery of every normal couples marriage and destroy the last vestiges of decency that exists. Yes! I know it sounds a bit dramatic, but its what I and many others believe, even though we have no say in the matter.

OK! So Who Do I Call Mummy?

And what about the children! So far as homosexuals adopting children is concerned, I find it abhorrent, and in no way believe that any child with two male parents stands any chance of a normal upbringing, despite them not being short on love for the child. Homosexual adoption is as yet in its infancy, and no-one can tell what the long term affects will be on a child’s development. I guess the picture on the left says it all.

Accuse me of ‘gay bashing’ if you like, but  that is not my intention, I just wish they behaved like normal individuals then there would be no need for this blog. I fail to see why normal people must have the ‘gay’ agenda shoved down their throats every day of the year. The disgusting display of men cavorting in skimpy outfits during a ‘gay parade, that normal people would get arrested for wearing in public are a disgrace. Be a homosexual if you wish, but keep it to yourselves, leave the church alone, and stop flaunting your deviance like a badge of honour!

In conclusion I have only this to say, if we throw away the last vestiges of morality and decency we will be left with anarchy.

Roy.


%d bloggers like this: