Now It’s Official – Gays Are More Important Than Religion!

I have just read with profound sadness, a report about a Derby England couple who have had their application to become foster parents thrown out of court because of their christian belief homosexuality is a sin.

Mr. & Mrs Johns

The couple, Mr and Mrs Johns, have successfully fostered fifteen children through the 90’s and given every one a good home, but according to the social worker handling their latest application, they cannot be granted another child because they could not tell that child it is acceptable to be homosexual. This is in direct contradiction to their Pentecostal faith, and is a view held by most good christians.

They approached the court to have the Social Services ruling overturned, but were told by the judge Lord Justice Mundy and Mr. Justice Beaton, (Quote): “our conclusions that the attitudes of potential foster carers to sexuality are relevant when considering an application for approval and as to the effect of the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Islington London Borough Council v Ladele (Liberty intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1357, and McFarlane v Relate Avon Limited [2010] EWCA Civ 880, we have also concluded that we should not grant permission”.So there it is out in the open at last!

Although the judges stated that no ‘clear evidence’ had been submitted by either side, and I must say I think their lawyer did not do a good job, they stated clearly that it was not a legal question as to the validity of christians to foster children, but more their refusal, on faith grounds, to acknowledge the legitimacy of homosexuality.

But why should a christian be forced to go against their faith by promoting sexual deviance to a child, just so they can act as foster parents?

Talking to reporters outside the court in London Mrs Johns is quoted as saying: “All we wanted was to offer a loving home to a child in need. We have a good track record as foster parents. We have been excluded because we have moral opinions based on our faith and we feel sidelined because we are Christians with normal, mainstream, Christian views on sexual ethics. We are prepared to love and accept any child. All we were not willing to do was to tell a small child that the practice of homosexuality was a good thing.”

‘Mummy’ and Daddy???

It seems that to be a christian with moral values in today’s ‘enlightened’ society, you are less worthy than a homosexual. Your christian beliefs are not worth a fig when even the law turns on you and says  (basically) homosexual rights are more important than yours. This is just another nail in the coffin for right-minded people who believe homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God, but have no rights under the reverse discriminatory laws that rule our lives.

As with the Penzance hotel couple of a short while ago, See my post:

the basic rights of a good christian couple have been trampled upon to glorify this base and disgusting practice, which with its current acceptance is destined to corrupt many future generations of children.

I know many will not agree with this statement, but it is my firm belief that due to the current ‘social acceptance’, the numbers of homosexual people in our society will skyrocket in years to come and bring with it many problems.

In the vanguard will be children who have been raised by homosexual couples, for despite what some pundits say, children are extremely perceptive to their surroundings and the home atmosphere, and in my opinion, many will turn out the same for no child can have a normal upbringing under these circumstances.

Experts predict that by 2050 Britain will be a Muslim state, and with the current birthrate of Muslims far outstripping our own, this is a distinct possibility.

I suppose the one good thing Islamization will bring with it is the Muslim hatred of homosexuality, for they make ‘no bones about it’, homo’s are hung without any qualms. When they take over the deviants will be running for the border.

But for today, it is sad when the rights of good, moral christians can be so callously cast aside in a british court to support the ever-increasing demands of a devious minority. May God help us all!


4 Responses to “Now It’s Official – Gays Are More Important Than Religion!”

  1. Hey Roy – lets not assume Christian is synonymous with moral. Also, good on the courts for recognizing that the needs of a child might not be met by parents with hateful-beliefs. If only belief in Christ would be a fix all, but it is not. I do not have to imagine what it would be like to grow up in a home filled with Christian “Love”. I applaud the courts for seeing beyond.


    • Hi Paul,
      Thanks for your interesting comment. I cannot agree with your opening statement, as I believe Christianity is synonymous with morality. It is the cornerstone of how people should care and behave towards others, and is exemplified by those who follow the faith closely at least. Most of the problems we have today like crime, greed and corruption etc would never happen if people were as religious as they were sixty or seventy years ago when my grandparents could leave their doors unlocked when they went on holiday. If everyone lived out there lives in the true Christian way we would not be in the mess we are today.
      I also do not believe your statement that “the needs of a child might not be met by parents with hateful-beliefs”. In what way are these people ‘hateful’ as you put it? They are just devout Christians who have raised a succession of foster children very successfully over a number of years. Their only ‘failing’ if you want to call it that, is they do not condone or support homosexuality.
      The one thing a child needs above all, especially children in foster care, is love and I think this couple have proved by their past record that they have plenty of that. The Judge’s decision is yet one more step in pampering to a minority, and is not in tune with the law of our land.
      Best Regards,


  2. When Alfred the Great published his book of law called the Dome, every law in it had a biblical referance. William I kept the laws of Edward the Confessor which were Alfreds laws, when Henry I issued his Charter of Liberties in 1100 it was a restatment of Alfreds Laws, when King John was forced to issue Magna Charta 1215 it was a restatment of the Charta of Liberties, when Charles I was presented with the Petition of Right in 1628 it was a demand that we be ruled according to law, (Alfreds Law) the Grand Remonstrance 1641 was a demand that we be ruled according to our law (Alfreds Laws) he failed to do that and he lost his head as a result. The Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 was a restatment of Alfreds Laws. Each of these laws I have mentioned is a Constitutional Law, which is superior law not subject to interferance by the courts. Lord Justice Mundy’s Ruling subverts the basis for all these major constitutional laws and is itself an act of Sedition at Common Law.


    • Hi Albert,
      Thanks for your input. You may well be right, but I think it would be a hard battle trying to convince the Human Rights and Equality people of the fact.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: